<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 64 / 2 = ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeb454.co.uk/2008/01/15/64-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeb454.co.uk/2008/01/15/64-2/</link>
	<description>Ubuntu, Linux &#38; Random Drivel</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mpiasecki</title>
		<link>http://joeb454.co.uk/2008/01/15/64-2/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>mpiasecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeb454.co.uk/2008/01/15/64-2/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Hello, stumbled upon your post on google.
I currently have 7.10 64-bit running on my home PC. From the point of installation to where I am now there have been little or no problems outside of browser plug-ins. That is until I wanted to start working with Eclipse. I don't blame Ubuntu for Sun and Macromedia's lack of support, but it's getting a bit silly.
I don't even want to think about a system update when a new release is available. I can't even keep track of what is 64-bit and what is 32-bit anymore. If you want a complete system change over with your OS (like from Windows 2000 to GNU/Linux as a web designer with no budget for a Apple Macintosh) I would say stick with 32-bit.

My situation does not bring a completely wasted processor. Originaly it came with a 32-bit AMD Sempron but I swapped it out for a 64X2. I still get to keep the dual-core feature out of the $40 I spent to upgrade the processor. Not a bad deal!

Stick with 32-bit for a desktop until there is full support. But go ahead with a 64-bit for a server. That is where 64-bit shines: script and code execution.

I'm hoping one day that this system will serve well for remote web, ssh , email and ftp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, stumbled upon your post on google.<br />
I currently have 7.10 64-bit running on my home PC. From the point of installation to where I am now there have been little or no problems outside of browser plug-ins. That is until I wanted to start working with Eclipse. I don&#8217;t blame Ubuntu for Sun and Macromedia&#8217;s lack of support, but it&#8217;s getting a bit silly.<br />
I don&#8217;t even want to think about a system update when a new release is available. I can&#8217;t even keep track of what is 64-bit and what is 32-bit anymore. If you want a complete system change over with your OS (like from Windows 2000 to GNU/Linux as a web designer with no budget for a Apple Macintosh) I would say stick with 32-bit.</p>
<p>My situation does not bring a completely wasted processor. Originaly it came with a 32-bit AMD Sempron but I swapped it out for a 64X2. I still get to keep the dual-core feature out of the $40 I spent to upgrade the processor. Not a bad deal!</p>
<p>Stick with 32-bit for a desktop until there is full support. But go ahead with a 64-bit for a server. That is where 64-bit shines: script and code execution.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping one day that this system will serve well for remote web, ssh , email and <a href="http://ftp" rel="nofollow">http://ftp</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
